Wrike

Add to wishlistAdded to wishlistRemoved from wishlist 5
Add to compare
Add your review
Product is rated as #2 in category Projects Management
9.1
⚡️ FREE plan available
Ease of Use9
User Interface8.9
Features9
Support9.2
Value for Money9.3

Short Description:
One platform to streamline all workflows, including: Dashboards – Gantt Charts – Project Resource Planning – Dynamic Request Forms – AI – Proofing – Project Views – Approvals – Automation – Custom Item Types – Kanban Boards – Cross-Tagging.

Pricing:
1️⃣ Free
2️⃣ Team= $9.80 /month
3️⃣ Business= $24.80 /month
4️⃣ Enterprise= According to the agreement

Description

⚡️⚡️ An expert review from our verified experts who have been using the tools for a long time to give professional reviews:
Caitlin M.
Verified Marketing Projects Management
—————————————————————-

Wrike Reviews 2025 In-Depth
Features, Pros, Cons, and Experts Opinion

Review of Wrike project management software with AI capabilities on marketertools.ai


Wrike Overview:

Having spent a significant amount of time using Wrike, I can confidently say that it has transformed the way I approach project management, particularly in marketing. At first glance, Wrike appears to be like any other project management tool. However, what stands out is the subtlety of its AI integration, which doesn’t scream for attention but quietly works in the background, improving processes without overshadowing the human element. Wrike became an integral part of my team’s daily workflow, enhancing how we handled multiple complex marketing campaigns at once.

Tools Experience:

My experience with Wrike evolved over several months of intense use. Initially, I was focused on understanding its capabilities, but as the weeks passed, the tool seamlessly blended into my daily routine. One of the aspects I appreciated most was how the AI-supported features offered suggestions at the right time, without overwhelming me or the team. These enhancements never felt intrusive but instead provided timely insights that helped us make better decisions.

I also found that Wrike’s interface, though rich with features, didn’t slow down the team’s momentum. In fact, it felt like it sped things up. The more I used Wrike, the more I realized how it adapted to my working style, which made the experience personalized. This adaptability was key in helping us refine our marketing projects, giving us a significant edge in handling complex tasks.

Evaluation:

After testing Wrike for an extended period, it’s clear that the tool has a unique way of improving efficiency without compromising quality. It’s not about reinventing how projects are managed but about subtly enhancing the experience, making daily tasks smoother and more intuitive. What sets Wrike apart is the way it creates harmony in a marketing team. Communication, task allocation, and project tracking became much more cohesive. It was like having an extra hand on deck that quietly made things easier.

The learning curve, while present, felt natural as I became more familiar with the tool. Over time, I found that Wrike began to shape my own workflow, almost as if it was adjusting to my needs rather than forcing me to adapt to it. This kind of flexibility is rare and something that, in my experience, stands out in the realm of digital marketing tools.

Impact Of Wrike Experience On Work:

The most tangible effect Wrike had on my work was in the way it improved collaboration. It wasn’t just about project completion; it was about how smoothly everything flowed from start to finish. With Wrike in place, my marketing team was able to reduce bottlenecks and move faster without sacrificing quality. It created a more organized environment where creativity could thrive without getting bogged down by administrative tasks.

Another noticeable change was the consistency in the quality of our projects. Wrike’s subtle AI features helped maintain a level of oversight that, in the past, would have required dedicated personnel. The long-term impact of using Wrike was a refined process, allowing us to deliver better marketing campaigns with greater confidence and less stress.

Result Of Using Wrike Products:

1. Dashboards:

Experience: The dashboards in Wrike have been central to my day-to-day workflow as a marketing expert. Over time, I’ve come to appreciate how customizable they are, allowing me to configure them to match the needs of different marketing campaigns. The ability to view multiple metrics, KPIs, and ongoing tasks in one place made it easy to monitor project progress and identify potential bottlenecks. It’s not just about the data—it’s the clarity and simplicity of how it’s presented. The real-time data updates helped my team stay aligned, and I loved how easy it was to filter information based on what was most important at any given time. It saved me from jumping between different tools, providing a single point of truth that streamlined decision-making and improved efficiency.

Strengths: One of the major strengths is how Wrike’s dashboards offer a seamless bird’s-eye view of multiple projects without feeling cluttered. The flexibility in widget arrangement and data representation made it easier to focus on performance metrics that mattered most. This clarity enhanced both individual productivity and team collaboration, ultimately improving project outcomes.

Weakness: The setting is complex dashboards initially required some trial and error, but once configured, they became an invaluable tool.

Outcome: The ability to oversee project metrics in one glance significantly boosted the efficiency of our marketing campaigns, leading to faster turnarounds and more informed decision-making.

2. Gantt Charts:

Experience: The Gantt charts in Wrike have been a game-changer in managing complex marketing campaigns that span multiple teams. Initially, I found the visual timeline incredibly helpful for laying out project stages and dependencies. What stood out to me was the ability to easily adjust timelines and link tasks dynamically. During high-pressure campaigns, Gantt charts helped visualize potential delays and allowed me to quickly reassign resources or shift deadlines to keep everything on track. Over time, I found myself relying on the Gantt charts not only for tracking but for planning future projects, as they offered a clear historical view of how we had managed similar tasks.

Strengths: Wrike’s Gantt charts offer exceptional clarity in visualizing task dependencies. The drag-and-drop feature for task adjustments made the entire project planning process more flexible, and the automatic updates to connected tasks ensured that the entire team stayed aligned.

Weakness: The charts can feel overwhelming if the project involves too many subtasks, but filtering options help mitigate this.

Outcome: Gantt charts improved my team’s ability to meet deadlines by making it easier to track progress and address bottlenecks before they escalated into major issues.

3. Project Resource Planning:

Experience: Resource planning in Wrike took my team’s project execution to the next level. Early on, I was impressed by how easy it was to assign resources based on availability, which is critical in marketing when multiple campaigns are running concurrently. Wrike provided a comprehensive view of who was working on what, allowing for smooth allocation without overburdening anyone. Over time, this feature became an essential part of my strategy meetings, where we would forecast future campaigns and adjust resources accordingly. I especially valued the insights Wrike provided in terms of resource allocation efficiency—helping me balance workloads while maximizing productivity.

Strengths: The clarity in visualizing team availability and workload distribution was a standout. Wrike’s resource planning ensured that no team member was overwhelmed and allowed me to allocate work based on real-time availability, leading to more balanced campaigns.

Weakness: Resource forecasting could sometimes be tricky with long-term projects, but tweaking the settings allowed for better predictions.

Outcome: Resource planning ensured smoother campaign execution and reduced team burnout, improving overall project delivery timelines.

4. Dynamic Request Forms:

Experience: Wrike’s dynamic request forms became a staple in streamlining the intake of marketing project requests. At first, they simplified how external stakeholders submitted detailed campaign requests. Over time, I customized these forms to gather specific project details upfront, minimizing back-and-forth communication and speeding up the process. The conditional logic in the forms allowed us to ask the right questions based on the type of project, which drastically reduced errors and misunderstandings. These forms became an essential part of how my team managed incoming requests efficiently.

Strengths: The ability to customize the forms with conditional logic was powerful, as it tailored the submission process based on the project needs. This feature significantly reduced the margin for error and made intake processes more organized and efficient.

Weakness: Occasionally, setting up complex forms with multiple conditions required additional time, but the long-term benefits outweighed this initial effort.

Outcome: The dynamic request forms streamlined project intake, reduced the back-and-forth in communication, and improved accuracy in project execution.

5. AI:

Experience: Wrike’s integration of AI felt subtle yet impactful in the marketing campaigns I managed. Over time, I found the AI-driven suggestions to be surprisingly accurate in predicting task deadlines and highlighting bottlenecks. The more I used the platform, the more the AI seemed to “learn” from my behavior, offering insights that were highly relevant to the way I worked. This helped me stay ahead of potential project delays and streamline workflows that would otherwise have been manual and time-consuming.

Strengths: The AI integration provided valuable, timely insights without being overbearing. It helped predict delays and optimize task allocations, allowing me to manage campaigns more efficiently with less manual oversight.

Weakness: Occasionally, the AI recommendations felt too generalized, but these instances were rare and didn’t detract from the overall experience.

Outcome: The subtle AI features improved decision-making and kept my projects on track, leading to smoother campaign execution.

6. Proofing:

Experience: Proofing within Wrike has been a significant timesaver, especially in creative marketing workflows. Before using Wrike, the process of reviewing creative assets involved multiple tools and back-and-forth emails. With Wrike’s proofing feature, I could easily share marketing collateral with the team, annotate directly on the files, and request changes, all within the platform. Over time, this seamless integration of reviewing and approving assets helped reduce errors and allowed quicker turnaround times. I particularly appreciated how the feedback loop became faster and more efficient as everyone involved could see updates in real time.

Strengths: The ability to annotate on different types of media directly in Wrike meant no more juggling emails or external tools. It kept the feedback process centralized, and everyone stayed on the same page. The version control also allowed me to see past feedback and revisions, making the review process smoother.

Weakness: One small drawback is that larger files sometimes took a bit longer to load, though this rarely affected deadlines.

Outcome: Wrike’s proofing tool accelerated the feedback process and made collaboration on creative assets far more efficient.

7. Project Views:

Experience: The customizable project views in Wrike were a revelation in terms of how I could visualize ongoing marketing projects. Depending on the nature of the campaign, I could switch between list views, board views, or timeline views, each providing different insights. Over time, I found myself using these different views to optimize how I managed team workflows. The flexibility of the views allowed me to assess progress and shift priorities quickly, especially when managing time-sensitive campaigns. This adaptability was crucial in ensuring nothing fell through the cracks, and deadlines were consistently met.

Strengths: The flexibility to switch between different views such as Kanban boards for visual task tracking or timeline views for scheduling made it easier to adapt to different campaign needs. This versatility ensured that I always had a clear perspective on project progress.

Weakness: Occasionally, switching between views caused a slight delay in rendering data, but it was minimal and didn’t disrupt workflow.

Outcome: The varied project views improved overall project visibility, helping to better manage tasks and deadlines with ease.

8. Approvals:

Experience: Wrike’s approval workflow made the process of getting marketing content approved seamless and transparent. I could set up automatic approval chains, which reduced manual follow-ups and ensured that the right people were notified at the right time. Over time, the tool proved to be invaluable, especially during peak campaign periods where quick approvals were crucial. It not only sped up the process but also ensured accountability as it provided a clear audit trail of who approved what, and when. It eliminated the chaos of missed emails or miscommunications.

Strengths: The automated approval workflows allowed for smooth transitions from one approver to the next, cutting down on waiting times. The transparency it provided ensured there were no bottlenecks in the approval process, making it much more efficient.

Weakness: The approval setup process can be somewhat rigid if the team structure changes suddenly, but with minor adjustments, this is manageable.

Outcome: The approval system helped streamline the marketing workflow, ensuring faster and more organized content sign-offs.

9. Automation:

Experience: Automation in Wrike turned out to be one of the most helpful features in my marketing projects. After an initial period of fine-tuning, I was able to set up workflows that automatically assigned tasks, notified team members of deadlines, and even moved projects along the pipeline. Over time, these automated processes saved countless hours of manual effort and allowed my team to focus on more creative tasks. I also appreciated how Wrike allowed for complex automation rules without the need for technical expertise. It was particularly useful in repetitive tasks, ensuring consistency and reducing human error.

Strengths: The automation capabilities in Wrike eliminated the need for constant manual updates and task management. I found it extremely useful in handling recurring tasks, freeing up time to focus on more critical marketing strategies.

Weakness: Setting up complex automations took some time and experimentation, but once set, the benefits far outweighed the initial effort.

Outcome: Automation dramatically improved workflow efficiency and allowed for better time management within marketing campaigns.

10. Custom Item Types:

Experience: Custom item types in Wrike allowed me to tailor the platform to specific marketing projects that didn’t fit into standard task or project categories. Whether we were working on a product launch or a content calendar, I could define item types with custom fields that captured the nuances of each project. Over time, this feature became indispensable as it allowed us to track very specific metrics and stages of work that were unique to our campaigns. Custom item types added a new layer of personalization and made Wrike feel less generic and more aligned with our specific marketing needs.

Strengths: The ability to create and manage custom item types meant that our unique workflows were well-catered for. It added flexibility and allowed for more detailed project tracking, which was key for specialized campaigns.

Weakness: Occasionally, creating custom item types required more setup time than anticipated, but the long-term benefits made it worthwhile.

Outcome: Custom item types made Wrike a more versatile tool, perfectly adapted to the specific needs of our marketing projects.

11. Kanban Boards:

Experience: Kanban boards in Wrike became my go-to for visual task management, particularly for managing marketing campaigns with multiple moving parts. The simplicity of dragging tasks between columns and keeping track of what was in progress or completed was a game-changer. Over time, the boards gave me a much clearer sense of task flow and helped the team visualize progress in real-time. It reduced the complexity of managing multiple team members and allowed for quick adjustments. In high-paced marketing environments, these boards were invaluable for their ease of use and clarity.

Strengths: The visual clarity and ease of dragging tasks between columns made task management straightforward. It’s a great tool for teams that need quick, real-time updates on task status, making collaboration smoother and more intuitive.

Weakness: For extremely large projects, the boards could get visually cluttered, but filtering options helped mitigate this issue.

Outcome: Kanban boards kept task management simple and visual, making team collaboration more efficient and project progress more transparent.

12. Cross-Tagging:

Experience: Cross-tagging was an unexpected but highly useful feature in Wrike. As marketing campaigns often intersect across different teams and departments, the ability to tag tasks across multiple projects provided clarity and better organization. Over time, this feature became a crucial part of managing overlapping projects. I could easily keep track of related tasks without duplicating effort or information. It added a new level of flexibility in task management and ensured that no tasks were missed, even if they were relevant to multiple teams.

Strengths: The flexibility of cross-tagging allowed tasks to be connected across projects, ensuring nothing fell through the cracks. It was particularly useful when campaigns intersected with other marketing efforts, providing better visibility and collaboration.

Weakness: Occasionally, it was easy to over-tag tasks, but with careful organization, this didn’t impact the overall workflow negatively.

Outcome: Cross-tagging made it easier to manage tasks that spanned multiple projects, ensuring better organization and reducing oversight.

Conclusion:

you to tailor the experience to fit your exact needs. The integration of AI is subtle yet impactful, streamlining workflows without taking control out of your hands. While there were minor learning curves with some tools, these were easily overcome with use, and the overall result was a more efficient, organized, and productive project management experience.

What truly set Wrike apart for me was its adaptability it didn’t force my team into rigid structures but allowed us to work in ways that felt natural and productive. Features like automation and resource planning saved hours of manual effort, while tools like proofing and approvals streamlined the more administrative aspects of marketing workflows. Cross-tagging, in particular, became essential in managing tasks across multiple campaigns, ensuring that nothing fell through the cracks.

In conclusion, Wrike is a reliable tool that adapts to the needs of marketing professionals, providing everything from in-depth project views to efficient automation.

 

9.1Expert Score
Caitlin M.
Verified Marketing Projects Management
Ease of Use
9
User Interface
8.9
Features
9
Support
9.2
Value for Money
9.3
PROS
  • Highly customizable dashboards for tailored project views.
  • AI integration subtly enhances project management without being intrusive.
  • Versatile Gantt charts allow for easy tracking of task dependencies.
  • Automation reduces manual effort and improves workflow efficiency.
  • Proofing tools streamline the review and feedback process for marketing assets.
  • Flexible project views (list, board, timeline) adapt to different workflows.
  • Cross-tagging allows tasks to be managed across multiple projects without duplication.
  • Resource planning tools ensure balanced workloads and team efficiency.
  • Custom item types allow for project-specific tracking and management.
  • Strong collaboration features enhance communication within teams.
CONS
  • Initial setup of advanced features like automation and dashboards can be time-consuming.
  • Gantt charts can become visually overwhelming with very large projects.
  • Occasional delays when switching between different project views.
  • Complexity in managing and adjusting custom item types for new users.

Additional information

Specification: Wrike

Main Services

✅ Dashboards
✅ Gantt Charts
✅ Project Resource Planning
✅ Dynamic Request Forms
✅ AI
✅ Proofing
✅ Project Views
✅ Approvals
✅ Automation
✅ Custom Item Types
✅ Kanban Boards
✅ Cross-Tagging

Typical Customers

☑️ Freelancers
☑️ Small Businesses
☑️ Mid-size Businesses
☑️ Large Enterprises

Platforms Supported

✅ Web
✅ Android
✅ iPhone/iPad

Supported Languages

☑️ English
☑️ Dansk
☑️ Deutsch
☑️ Español
☑️ Français
☑️ Bahasa Indonesia
☑️ Italiano
☑️ Bahasa Melayu
☑️ Nederlands
☑️ Norsk Polski
☑️ Portugues(BR)
☑️ Svenska
☑️ PycckNN
☑️ Chines

Technical Support Options

✅ Email/Help Desk
✅ Phone Support
✅ FAQs/Forum
✅ 24/7 (Live rep)

Training Options

☑️ Videos
☑️ Webinars
☑️ Documentations

Payment Options

✅ Free plan
✅ Subscription
✅ Free trial

Videos

Videos: Wrike

Reviews (0)

Reviews

There are no reviews yet

Add a review
Wrike Wrike
Rating*
0/5
* Rating is required
* Answer is required
* Answer is required
Your review
* Review is required
Name
* Name is required
* Please tick the checkbox to proceed
MarketerTools.ai
Logo
Compare items
  • Total (0)
Compare
0
Shopping cart